Nytimes.com | It’s certainly special for Erdogan, Putin and al-Assad.
The editorial board is a group of opinion journalists whose views are informed by expertise, research, debate and certain longstanding values. It is separate from the newsroom.
nybooks.com | Bye Peter W. Galbraith | October 24, 2019
The full consequences of President Trump’s decision on October 6 to withdraw American troops and give Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdoğan a green light to invade northeast Syria are not yet clear. Erdoğan claimed that he wanted to create a twenty-mile buffer zone in which perhaps one million Syrian refugees living in Turkey could be resettled, but he may have had the ambition of turning all of northeast Syria over to the Islamists whom Turkey had sponsored in western Syria during the country’s civil war and who were largely defeated there.
The Times | By Tom Parfitt (Moscow), and Hannah Lucinda Smith (Istanbul) | October 23, 2019
The leaders of Russia and Turkey have agreed to enforce the removal of Kurdish fighters from northeastern Syria and conduct joint patrols, in a deal that secured Moscow’s dominance in the region.
Nytimes.com | By Ian Buruma
The sudden decision to pull about 1,000 American troops out of northern Syria, and leave Kurdish allies in the lurch after they did so much to fight off the Islamic State, has already had terrible consequences. The Kurds have been forced to make a deal with the murderous regime of President Bashar al-Assad of Syria, hoping it will protect them against being massacred by incoming Turkish troops who regard them as mortal enemies. Russia and Iran, without whose support Mr. Assad’s government would not have survived, are quick to benefit from America’s sudden retreat. Violence in an already ghastly Syrian civil war could get a great deal worse.