nytimes.com | By John McCAIN (*) — October 24, 2017

WASHINGTON — Clashes this month between elements of the Iraqi security forces and Kurdish fighters around Kirkuk are deeply troubling, in particular because of the United States’ longstanding friendship with the Kurdish people. These clashes are also emblematic of a broader, more troubling reality: Beyond our tactical successes in the fight against the Islamic State, the United States is still dangerously lacking a comprehensive strategy toward the rest of the Middle East in all of its complexity.

By Bernard-Henri Lévy | October 21, 2017 6:36 PM

Two years after the Kurds fought against the Islamic State, America turned its back as they sought independence.

Bbc.com

There have been fierce clashes between Kurdish and Iraqi troops north of Kirkuk city, days after the Iraqi army took control of disputed areas.

bloomberg.com | By Eli Lake(*) — 19 octobre 2017

Baghdad and Washington say the invasion has been no big deal. The Kurds beg to differ.

the-american-interest.com | Jonathan Spyer (*) - Published on: October 18, 2017 

Tehran’s strategizing pays off again, as several of its clients strike a deal that undermines Kurdish hopes of independence.

cnn.com | By Kosrat Rasul Ali (*) — 18 Oct 2017

(CNN) Many who follow what is happening in the Middle East will be wondering what's next for the failed former states of Iraq and Syria in a post-ISIS world.

reuters.com | Reuters Staff - October 16, 2017
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States sought on Monday to avoid openly taking sides in an Iraqi-Kurdish dispute, as Iraq’s capture of the Kurdish-held city of Kirkuk raised the risk of an open conflict between U.S. allies in the fight against Islamic State.

washingtonpost.com | By Adam Taylor(*) - October 17

Want smart analysis of the most important news in your inbox every weekday along with other global reads, interesting ideas and opinions to know? Sign up for the Today's WorldView newsletter.

Tabletmag.com - By Bernard-Henri Lévy

‘We should not have abandoned Kurdistan, the only real pole of stability in the region’

newyorker.com | By Dexter Filkins(*) October 16, 2017

On Sunday, Qassem Suleimani, Iran’s chief spymaster, travelled to the Iraqi city of Sulaimaniya to meet with the leaders of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan, or P.U.K., one of the two main Kurdish political parties. For years, the P.U.K. and its sister party, the Kurdish Democratic Party, or K.D.P., have been struggling to break away from the rest of Iraq and form an independent state. A Kurdish republic is opposed by all the region’s countries—the governments in Baghdad, Turkey, and Iran—which fear that sizable Kurdish minorities in all three nations will begin to act autonomously. Only weeks ago, in a region-wide referendum, Iraq’s Kurds voted overwhelmingly to secede. The Kurdish dream, it seemed, was tantalizingly within reach.